<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RootsMagic 4 Unwrapped &#8211; Citation Quality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rootsmagic.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=41" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rootsmagic.com/?p=41</link>
	<description>News about RootsMagic, Personal Historian, and Family Atlas software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:42:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThinkGenealogy Innovator Award #4 &#124; ThinkGenealogy</title>
		<link>http://blog.rootsmagic.com/?p=41&#038;cpage=1#comment-6262</link>
		<dc:creator>ThinkGenealogy Innovator Award #4 &#124; ThinkGenealogy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 19:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rootsmagic.com/?p=41#comment-6262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 4 the end of March 2009.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 4 the end of March 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Hodge</title>
		<link>http://blog.rootsmagic.com/?p=41&#038;cpage=1#comment-1320</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Hodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rootsmagic.com/?p=41#comment-1320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went to the BCG site through the link you provided.  Under their paragraph &quot;Direct or Indirect Evidence&quot; they don&#039;t discuss negative evidence.  Should the definition you are using be something like &quot;Refutes the statement&quot; rather than &quot;the source is missing information&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to the BCG site through the link you provided.  Under their paragraph &#8220;Direct or Indirect Evidence&#8221; they don&#8217;t discuss negative evidence.  Should the definition you are using be something like &#8220;Refutes the statement&#8221; rather than &#8220;the source is missing information&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Beeman</title>
		<link>http://blog.rootsmagic.com/?p=41&#038;cpage=1#comment-1203</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Beeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 21:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rootsmagic.com/?p=41#comment-1203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Bob,

RM4 is following the guidelines of the Board of Certified Genealogists for citation qualities.

This web page has helped me understand how they work. 

http://www.bcgcertification.org/skillbuilders/skbld085.html

Laura]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bob,</p>
<p>RM4 is following the guidelines of the Board of Certified Genealogists for citation qualities.</p>
<p>This web page has helped me understand how they work. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bcgcertification.org/skillbuilders/skbld085.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bcgcertification.org/skillbuilders/skbld085.html</a></p>
<p>Laura</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Cole</title>
		<link>http://blog.rootsmagic.com/?p=41&#038;cpage=1#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 03:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rootsmagic.com/?p=41#comment-493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The categories under &quot;Evidence&quot; for citation quality (especially &quot;negative&quot;) seem to not fit well.  Instead of Direct, Indirect &amp; Negative, I think Conclusive, Substantive, and Supportive would show better they quality of the particular type of evidence for the citation.  Just a thought.  Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The categories under &#8220;Evidence&#8221; for citation quality (especially &#8220;negative&#8221;) seem to not fit well.  Instead of Direct, Indirect &amp; Negative, I think Conclusive, Substantive, and Supportive would show better they quality of the particular type of evidence for the citation.  Just a thought.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GentleGeek</title>
		<link>http://blog.rootsmagic.com/?p=41&#038;cpage=1#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>GentleGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 15:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rootsmagic.com/?p=41#comment-323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One the screen image you showed, there is a misspelling.. 
&quot;Primary: This information was provided by somone with firsthand knowledge...&quot;

&quot;somone&quot;??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One the screen image you showed, there is a misspelling..<br />
&#8220;Primary: This information was provided by somone with firsthand knowledge&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;somone&#8221;??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gsinbcmo</title>
		<link>http://blog.rootsmagic.com/?p=41&#038;cpage=1#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>gsinbcmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 03:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rootsmagic.com/?p=41#comment-240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alright, enough already.  When&#039;s it coming?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, enough already.  When&#8217;s it coming?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Bird</title>
		<link>http://blog.rootsmagic.com/?p=41&#038;cpage=1#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rootsmagic.com/?p=41#comment-236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Bruce.  As the citation quality screen is so different from the existing screen, what happens to the current entries (primary, secondary, etc) when I upgrade?  I very much like RM and am looking forward to the upgrade.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bruce.  As the citation quality screen is so different from the existing screen, what happens to the current entries (primary, secondary, etc) when I upgrade?  I very much like RM and am looking forward to the upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelia Hunt</title>
		<link>http://blog.rootsmagic.com/?p=41&#038;cpage=1#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelia Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 23:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rootsmagic.com/?p=41#comment-186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Bruce!  I&#039;m really pleased to see all these exciting new features coming in the new version of RootsMagic, which is already the best genealogy software on the market.  I&#039;m sure glad I changed to your software years ago.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Bruce!  I&#8217;m really pleased to see all these exciting new features coming in the new version of RootsMagic, which is already the best genealogy software on the market.  I&#8217;m sure glad I changed to your software years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John James</title>
		<link>http://blog.rootsmagic.com/?p=41&#038;cpage=1#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>John James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rootsmagic.com/?p=41#comment-185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it can&#039;t be far away now, I am down to checking every couple of hours in expectation of the first major feature peek and it&#039;s just not working )~:]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it can&#8217;t be far away now, I am down to checking every couple of hours in expectation of the first major feature peek and it&#8217;s just not working )~:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.rootsmagic.com/?p=41&#038;cpage=1#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rootsmagic.com/?p=41#comment-181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is fantastic.  I am currently working on my certification portfolio and these additions are just what I need!!!

Hopefully, RM4 will be unveiled and available for purchase at FGS in a few weeks......]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is fantastic.  I am currently working on my certification portfolio and these additions are just what I need!!!</p>
<p>Hopefully, RM4 will be unveiled and available for purchase at FGS in a few weeks&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
